Rated X

What I'm writing below is rated X.

If you cannot stand filthy language, you are advised not to read further.

I read Friday's 11 April 2008 Straits Times' report of NTUC helping poor workers with 'U Stretch' Vouchers. The example given by Goh Chin Lian of ST is that Mr Ahmad who spends about $150 a month at Fairprice Supermarket would save at least $7.50 with the help of NTUC. I thought, at last, they care.

Then I read OnlineCitizen's Mr Leong Sze Hian and Mr Andrew Loh of NTUC's exploitation of the poor and have come to the conclusion that NTUC is nothing but Congress Union National Trade. If what Mr Leong and Mr Loh wrote is true then the stinking CUNT is a national embarrassment that matches our Ministry of Home Affair's magic of Mas Selamat!

Bloody hell, why stoop so low to increase your business? Why put on an altruistic front when the goal is to increase sales and bottom line? So that management can get a bigger bonus? So what the FCUK is wrong with the CUNT?

Could it be that they have their sticky finger in too many pies? They screwed with supermarkets, healthcare, public transport, insurance and what else? Which industry will they fcuk next? I don't know.

All I know is if the CUNT is made up of MIW, the workers ends up with finger in the rear end. Yes U Stretched! Then again, MIW also have their sticky finger everywhere.

Do they care?

Do they really give a fcuk if we live or die?

Or are they only interested in their power and million $,$$$,$$$ salary?

Your answer is as good as mine.

Maybe Mick Jagger can be a better union head :)

Frustratingly reamed again,
feedmetothefish